By Cameron Rasmusson
Council members voted to withdraw the Sandpoint resolution supporting refugee resettlement Wednesday night, bringing an end to a heated, month-long controversy.
Cheers erupted from the audience when Sandpoint Mayor Shelby Rognstad asked the council to withdraw the resolution from consideration. A measure meant to counter statements from the Bonner County commissioners and sheriff opposing the resettlement of refugees, the resolution was intended to restate Sandpoint’s commitments to human rights, according to Rognstad.
“This resolution has only served to divide us and this community,” said Rognstad as he requested the withdrawal. “That saddens me.”
Once again, anti-refugee activists turned out in force to oppose the resolution, and once again, the council meeting procedure was punctured by applause and shouts. When Rognstad called for order, the crowd responded with catcalls.
The evening also saw a mobilization of refugee supporters, who held a candle-lit vigil outside City Hall. Anti-Islam demonstrators gathered on the other side of the parking lot waving American flags and signs.
For Rognstad, the issue was a matter of community values. He said the resolution was intended as a statement similar to the human rights resolutions and non-discrimination ordinances that Sandpoint has approved in the past.
“Do we want to be known as a community that celebrates tolerance and compassion, or do we want to be known as a community that embraces fear and discrimination?” he asked at the opening of the council meeting.
However, it was clear from the outset that council support had fallen away from the resolution. Councilman Tom Eddy opened the discussion by saying he could not vote in favor of the resolution.
“I cannot support the resolution as it stands,” he said. “It serves as a piece of rhetoric that only serves to be divisive.”
In the same vein, Councilwoman Deb Ruehle issued a plea for community solidarity.
“None of us here in this room are people of hatred,” she said. “[This issue] is not cut and dried. It is extremely complex.”
“There is too much unrest, too much negativity,” she continued. “Mr. Mayor, please withdraw this resolution.”
The decision was a victory for those who opposed the resolution. Victoria Zeischegg, a prominent local conservative figure, said she was pleased with the decision.
“I appreciate the withdrawal,” she said.
Others saw the decision as a defeat for human rights in Sandpoint. Daniel Radford, one of the members of the candle-lit vigil, said he was a committed Christian but was disturbed by the message many were presenting in the name of Christ.
“I’m disappointed to see so many good Christian people worship the fear of Muslims rather than the fear of God,” he said.
While we have you ...
... if you appreciate that access to the news, opinion, humor, entertainment and cultural reporting in the Sandpoint Reader is freely available in our print newspaper as well as here on our website, we have a favor to ask. The Reader is locally owned and free of the large corporate, big-money influence that affects so much of the media today. We're supported entirely by our valued advertisers and readers. We're committed to continued free access to our paper and our website here with NO PAYWALL - period. But of course, it does cost money to produce the Reader. If you're a reader who appreciates the value of an independent, local news source, we hope you'll consider a voluntary contribution. You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.
You can contribute at either Paypal or Patreon.Contribute at Patreon Contribute at Paypal