Dear Editor,
The FBI has said that there is no evidence to date that Trump ever met with a Russian figure banned from the United States.
Yet, Trump fired Paul Manafort on Aug. 18, 2016, when he heard that a New York Times report revealed that Trump’s campaign chairman was designated to receive potentially illegal cash payments from a pro-Russian political party in Ukraine.
McCain’s drama involved Paul Manafort’s law partner Rick Davis and one of the same Russian oligarchs, Oleg Deripaska; the same Russian diplomat, Sergey Kislyak, and the same wily Russian leader, Vladimir Putin, that now dominate the current Trump controversy.
Behind the scenes McCain’s top advisers had cultivated deep ties with Russia’s oligarchy and promoted the Kremlin’s geopolitical and economic interests. Davis Manafort’s work was considered so detrimental to U.S. interests that a National Security Council official called McCain’s office to complain, according to the New York Times. The McCain campaign denies receiving the NSC complaint.
McCain actually met twice with Deripaska, a Russian businessman and Putin ally whose visa was blocked by the United States amidst intelligence community concerns about his ties to Moscow. The meetings were arranged by Rick Davis, Manafort’s partner in the law partner, who later would become McCain’s campaign manager.
Either McCain was utterly clueless while his top advisers and political allies ran around the former Soviet domain promoting the Kremlin’s interests for cash, or he was aware of it and didn’t care. Nonetheless, McCain didn’t fire Rick Davis (Manafort’s business partner).
A person might wonder why in McCain’s campaign, being informed by the FBI of the potential for espionage, he did nothing. Where, in Trump’s campaign, with only the potential for contact, the decision by the FBI was to insert spies into Trump’s campaign.
Maureen Paterson
Priest River
While we have you ...
... if you appreciate that access to the news, opinion, humor, entertainment and cultural reporting in the Sandpoint Reader is freely available in our print newspaper as well as here on our website, we have a favor to ask. The Reader is locally owned and free of the large corporate, big-money influence that affects so much of the media today. We're supported entirely by our valued advertisers and readers. We're committed to continued free access to our paper and our website here with NO PAYWALL - period. But of course, it does cost money to produce the Reader. If you're a reader who appreciates the value of an independent, local news source, we hope you'll consider a voluntary contribution. You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.
You can contribute at either Paypal or Patreon.
Contribute at Patreon Contribute at Paypal