The Mank-ing of Citizen Kane

New David Fincher biopic explores the writer behind Orson Welles’ masterpiece

By Zach Hagadone
Reader Staff

Movies about movies being written by writers — much less writing a review of such a movie — risks plunging viewers and readers alike into a snarl of competing narratives, muddied intentions and scrambled perspectives. When that movie is the frenzied penning of Citizen Kane by journalist/critic/and screenwriter Herman “Mank” Mankiewicz in 1940, the circuitous blending of artist and subject, the fluidity of time, and line between medium and message seems unusually appropriate.

Gary Oldman and Amanda Seyfried in Mank. Courtesy image.

Of course, Citizen Kane and its legendary auteur director and star Orson Welles are (or should be) considered iconic by audiences — the premise of both being a thinly veiled cautionary tale about the unchecked power and ambition of real-life media baron William Randolph Hearst. Less widely known is the role played by Mankiewicz in creating the first draft of the screenplay. Broadly, that’s what Mank is about, but no more so than Citizen Kane is about a sled. 

Released Dec. 4 in theaters and on streaming platform Netflix — and screening Thursday, Dec. 10-Sunday, Dec. 13 at the Panida Theater — Mank is a biopic about a man but also an entire entertainment ecosystem; simultaneously a piece of period nostalgia and an indictment of the cynicism, greed and pettiness baked into the bones of America’s various dream factories.

Shot in stylish, gauzy black-and-white by director David Fincher, whose father Jack receives writing credit, we are bounced back and forth from the early 1940s to the mid-1930s with the shambling, barb-tongued and boozy Mank as our guide into the nether spaces of Tinseltown.

When we meet Mank (played to perfection by Gary Oldman), he’s already washed up; yet, on the strength of his past brilliance, still indulged to draw a hefty studio paycheck and ramble about the backlots — incessantly smoking, gambling and drinking with a stable of side-eyed, wiseass writers whom he has personally assembled.

Despite the witty repartee and fancy parties, it’s clear that Mank is a vessel empty but for a minor ocean of whiskey. His “second chance,” as it were, comes after a car accident leaves him laid up with a broken leg in a dusty guesthouse in the southern California desert. 

Bed-ridden, unshaven, sweaty and perpetually in a bathrobe that can be practically smelled through the screen, Mank has been charged with writing the script for Welles’ first feature film — what would become Citizen Kane. Yet, he’s also in a forced convalescence intended to heal his leg and keep him sober enough to handle a pen — both tall orders, made taller when his deadline is shortened from 90 to 60 days. Naturally, as most writers, he doesn’t really get down to work until he has a mere two weeks left before he must deliver the finished work.

That’s one of the narratives at play in Mank, as he and his handlers bring the screenplay to fruition — punctuated by some nagging and a confrontation with Welles, admirably portrayed by Tom Burke. The other story being told is through a mass of flashbacks that occupy what seems to be at least half of the screen time. 

Those flashbacks cover the most ground, including the erstwhile protagonist’s fraught relationships with studio bosses and the passel of courtesans surrounding Hearst at his San Simeon pleasure palace — complete with giraffes and elephants grazing the grounds — his platonic love affair with Randolph’s much-younger lover Marion Davies (Amanda Seyfried), and his own exasperated family, with Tuppence Middleton as his wife “poor Sara” and Tom Pelphrey as brother Joe, who went on to become a successful director and writer, even as Mank’s alcoholism killed him at 55.

There are elements of redemption in Mank, but also satire, no small amount of sorrow and, as with Citizen Kane itself, power and obsession. Not quite a masterpiece itself, but an engaging piece by (and about) a master.

Mank (R)
Thursday, Dec. 10, 6:30 p.m.; Friday, Dec. 11-Saturday, Dec. 12, 7:30 p.m.; Sunday, Dec. 13, 3:30 p.m.; $6 18 and under, $9 adults. Panida Theater, 111 First Ave., 208-263-9191, Also streaming at

While we have you ...

... if you appreciate that access to the news, opinion, humor, entertainment and cultural reporting in the Sandpoint Reader is freely available in our print newspaper as well as here on our website, we have a favor to ask. The Reader is locally owned and free of the large corporate, big-money influence that affects so much of the media today. We're supported entirely by our valued advertisers and readers. We're committed to continued free access to our paper and our website here with NO PAYWALL - period. But of course, it does cost money to produce the Reader. If you're a reader who appreciates the value of an independent, local news source, we hope you'll consider a voluntary contribution. You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.

You can contribute at either Paypal or Patreon.

Contribute at Patreon Contribute at Paypal

You may also like...

Close [x]

Want to support independent local journalism?

The Sandpoint Reader is our town's local, independent weekly newspaper. "Independent" means that the Reader is locally owned, in a partnership between Publisher Ben Olson and Keokee Co. Publishing, the media company owned by Chris Bessler that also publishes Sandpoint Magazine and Sandpoint Online. Sandpoint Reader LLC is a completely independent business unit; no big newspaper group or corporate conglomerate or billionaire owner dictates our editorial policy. And we want the news, opinion and lifestyle stories we report to be freely available to all interested readers - so unlike many other newspapers and media websites, we have NO PAYWALL on our website. The Reader relies wholly on the support of our valued advertisers, as well as readers who voluntarily contribute. Want to ensure that local, independent journalism survives in our town? You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.