Scotchman Peaks…

Dear Editor,

In Mr. Myers’ letter (Nov. 5) disapproving of the proposed Wilderness designation for the Scotchman Peaks, he stated that there are many Bonner County residents who feel as he does. I am certain that he is absolutely correct on this point, since I am unable to think of anything in this county, or in fact this country, where we all agree.

I, however, disagree with several other of Mr. Myers points. The value of the entire Scotchmans proposed wilderness far exceeds just the beauty and views from the Peak—it is the wild character of an ecologically intact place, including flora, fauna (including those overly-friendly mountain goats), alpine lakes, and places for quiet solitude (yes, there are plenty to be found).

Perhaps it is less the publicity of the designation effort that is causing the crowds on the Peak (as Mr. Myers states), as it is an indication of our real and ever-increasing human need for these places where we can reconnect with Nature.

Mr. Myers also states that since there are unreclaimed roads (which, by the way, are well on their way to disappearing on their own) and some old clear-cuts (which are quite small) in the proposed area, that these disqualify the Scotchman Peaks from designation per the Wilderness Act. Yes, the Act calls for an area “untrammeled by man,” but if one reads further, it also goes on to account for some preexisting human disturbance i.e. “without permanent improvements … affected primarily by the forces of nature … imprint of man’s work substantially unnoticeable…”

The Wilderness Act, now over 50 years old, has bestowed upon us all the places where we, as well as future generations, can experience “land retaining its primeval character and influence.”

As E. O. Wilson notes; “Wild environments …we really need them, because it’s home.”

Denise Zembryki

While we have you ...

... if you appreciate that access to the news, opinion, humor, entertainment and cultural reporting in the Sandpoint Reader is freely available in our print newspaper as well as here on our website, we have a favor to ask. The Reader is locally owned and free of the large corporate, big-money influence that affects so much of the media today. We're supported entirely by our valued advertisers and readers. We're committed to continued free access to our paper and our website here with NO PAYWALL - period. But of course, it does cost money to produce the Reader. If you're a reader who appreciates the value of an independent, local news source, we hope you'll consider a voluntary contribution. You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.

You can contribute at either Paypal or Patreon.

Contribute at Patreon Contribute at Paypal

You may also like...

Close [x]

Want to support independent local journalism?

The Sandpoint Reader is our town's local, independent weekly newspaper. "Independent" means that the Reader is locally owned, in a partnership between Publisher Ben Olson and Keokee Co. Publishing, the media company owned by Chris Bessler that also publishes Sandpoint Magazine and Sandpoint Online. Sandpoint Reader LLC is a completely independent business unit; no big newspaper group or corporate conglomerate or billionaire owner dictates our editorial policy. And we want the news, opinion and lifestyle stories we report to be freely available to all interested readers - so unlike many other newspapers and media websites, we have NO PAYWALL on our website. The Reader relies wholly on the support of our valued advertisers, as well as readers who voluntarily contribute. Want to ensure that local, independent journalism survives in our town? You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.