Scotchman Peaks…

Dear Editor,

The January 25 article about the proposed Scotchman Wilderness by Cameron Rasmusson was much better than the ridiculously slanted Daily Stink Bug article on the recent Clark Fork meeting, but still needs help with basic journalism. I am happy to help.

Rasmusson states that “several people” opposed the legislation. A better description would have been “most” or the “overwhelming majority” of the attendees were opposed, but maybe Cameron slipped out with Cary Kelly, who skedaddled before the majority could speak? We see Sen. Risch telling us “there has been no process,” when in actuality, the USFS has been in “process” with it for decades, even proudly telling the audience of the many meetings and comment periods, yet leaving out the part where the USFS violated federal law by not holding ANY public hearings in the areas potentially affected by such actions.

Then we read that “significant push-back only emerged at Clark Fork.” It would have been clearer to write that “At the first public meeting in held outside of Sandpoint in Bonner County, in the 12 years of FSPW campaigning and decades of the USFS process, the meeting that was held at the request of concerned local citizens, there was significant push-back, even a rejection of this proposal.” Too bad our former commissioners chose also to represent just Sandpoint and not Bonner County on this issue, but maybe that is why two are gone and the third still couldn’t find the time to go to Clark Fork, even though our two new commissioners did (thanks, guys).

So Darren Parker, the Risch staffer, decided that most concerns were ideological? Isn’t most of the support founded in ideology too? All that gushy stuff about the need for wondrous solitude and soul-enriching, enchanted wilderness experience? We did hear from the get-go, a lot of anger about use restrictions (snowmobiles, game carriers, wood cutting, etc), USFS mismanagement of surrounding areas to create the next wilderness, poor USFS (non-existent) public communication about supposed wilderness-like management, concerns about wildlife, fire and timber management, the government’s authority to ban entry and firearms in wilderness, stacked rules, regulations and restrictions in Wilderness.

Call the new Bonner County (not the previous and exclusive Sandpoint) Commissioners at 265-1438 and tell them you oppose this wilderness, the past shameful process and land lock-up in our backyard!

Stan Myers

While we have you ...

... if you appreciate that access to the news, opinion, humor, entertainment and cultural reporting in the Sandpoint Reader is freely available in our print newspaper as well as here on our website, we have a favor to ask. The Reader is locally owned and free of the large corporate, big-money influence that affects so much of the media today. We're supported entirely by our valued advertisers and readers. We're committed to continued free access to our paper and our website here with NO PAYWALL - period. But of course, it does cost money to produce the Reader. If you're a reader who appreciates the value of an independent, local news source, we hope you'll consider a voluntary contribution. You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.

You can contribute at either Paypal or Patreon.

Contribute at Patreon Contribute at Paypal

You may also like...

Close [x]

Want to support independent local journalism?

The Sandpoint Reader is our town's local, independent weekly newspaper. "Independent" means that the Reader is locally owned, in a partnership between Publisher Ben Olson and Keokee Co. Publishing, the media company owned by Chris Bessler that also publishes Sandpoint Magazine and Sandpoint Online. Sandpoint Reader LLC is a completely independent business unit; no big newspaper group or corporate conglomerate or billionaire owner dictates our editorial policy. And we want the news, opinion and lifestyle stories we report to be freely available to all interested readers - so unlike many other newspapers and media websites, we have NO PAYWALL on our website. The Reader relies wholly on the support of our valued advertisers, as well as readers who voluntarily contribute. Want to ensure that local, independent journalism survives in our town? You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.