A Few Thoughts… On wilderness and what it really means

By Sandy Compton
Reader Columnist

Fall is falling. Sunday morning, it becomes official. I will — hopefully — be in a spot that cares nothing for the arbitrary Gregorian calendar, but is sensitive to the celestial timetable that inspired such things. I plan to be in the Scotchman Peaks backcountry for the equinox and the bright remnants of a full moon. 

Over the past 25 years, I’ve made several trips into the Scotchmans annually, but this will be my only backcountry foray for this year. The reduction in frequency is directly related to the condition of my knees. 

When Grandpa Earl was about my current age, he pointed at those same peaks and said, “See those mountains? I can climb any one of them. I just can’t come back down.”

I understand. But, I’m gonna go anyway. 

I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve hiked the Scotchmans but I might venture 100-plus, if I count my days as the Friends of Scotchman Peaks Wilderness (FSPW) trail crew leader. The FSPW Extreme Plein Air Expedition, which is the occasion this week, is in its 15th iteration. It will be a semi-short trip of three days and two nights, and maybe my last overnighter into that country beyond the end of the trail. Maybe. I could rethink that, once I’m there. 

I have looked at the map longingly, and wonder how much damage I would do to myself if I undertook one last trip cross-country from the Little Spar trailhead to the Clark Fork River. As the raven flies, that’s about eight miles. As the backpacker hikes, though, it’s never been fewer than four days, and more often five. Maybe, if I can get a couple of porters, I can do it in six or seven. I’ll tell you one thing: If I can, I will. The Scotchman backcountry is one of the most magical, sacred places I’ve ever been. 

This month is the 60th anniversary of the Wilderness Act, signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964. The Scotchman Peaks were identified in the 1970s as eligible to be part of the National Wilderness Preservation System established by the Act. Since then, the Scotchman Peaks have been listed as recommended wilderness and managed as such by the National Forests of North Idaho and western Montana. 

In 2019, Bonner County held an advisory vote asking citizens if they were for or against a nationally designated Wilderness Area in the Idaho portion of the peaks. The idea was rejected. The decision didn’t change the recommended status of the Scotchmans; and certainly didn’t reduce its wild beauty or the magic. It did demonstrate — again — that a campaign based on misinformation, disinformation, character assassination and other nasty tactics could sway an election. 

During that campaign, lies were told about what wilderness designation means, and about people who support it. Wilderness is not an elitist idea. The wilderness system was established to save wild places for all citizens. People who support Scotchman designation are not dark-money groups from outside or newcomers with hidden agendas. The hidden-agenda charge might be more true of the opponents to designation, who I believe were less than forthcoming about their real motivations. Unlike them, I won’t speculate about that. 

Wilderness supporters are your neighbors; some new, some whose families have lived here since before some who campaigned against it lived here. Wilderness designation doesn’t “lock up” a place or lock out people who want to enjoy it through self-powered recreation. It doesn’t preclude hunting, fishing, berry and mushroom gathering. It doesn’t disallow horses or other stock. There are no locked gates at wilderness trailheads. 

And, though this idea is so ridiculous, I can’t imagine the mindset necessary to believe it. There are no secret fortresses full of soldiers in blue helmets ready to take over the country in the wilderness. 

After this sees publication, there might be pushback from folks who campaigned against designation. If there is, I encourage you to check out the validity of what they have to say. 

Meanwhile, if you want to get in touch with me, I’ll be in the backcountry.

While we have you ...

... if you appreciate that access to the news, opinion, humor, entertainment and cultural reporting in the Sandpoint Reader is freely available in our print newspaper as well as here on our website, we have a favor to ask. The Reader is locally owned and free of the large corporate, big-money influence that affects so much of the media today. We're supported entirely by our valued advertisers and readers. We're committed to continued free access to our paper and our website here with NO PAYWALL - period. But of course, it does cost money to produce the Reader. If you're a reader who appreciates the value of an independent, local news source, we hope you'll consider a voluntary contribution. You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.

You can contribute at either Paypal or Patreon.

Contribute at Patreon Contribute at Paypal

You may also like...

Close [x]

Want to support independent local journalism?

The Sandpoint Reader is our town's local, independent weekly newspaper. "Independent" means that the Reader is locally owned, in a partnership between Publisher Ben Olson and Keokee Co. Publishing, the media company owned by Chris Bessler that also publishes Sandpoint Magazine and Sandpoint Online. Sandpoint Reader LLC is a completely independent business unit; no big newspaper group or corporate conglomerate or billionaire owner dictates our editorial policy. And we want the news, opinion and lifestyle stories we report to be freely available to all interested readers - so unlike many other newspapers and media websites, we have NO PAYWALL on our website. The Reader relies wholly on the support of our valued advertisers, as well as readers who voluntarily contribute. Want to ensure that local, independent journalism survives in our town? You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.