Benefits of Keeping Sunnyside Cedars Outweigh Negatives…

Dear Editor,

As a resident of Sunnyside, I was pleased to see coverage of the proposed timber sale within the peninsula in the December 1 issue of The Reader. Along with other Friends of Sunnyside Cedars, I oppose the logging of the two parcels.

I am not a forester and realize that I may not be aware of some important aspects of the proposed sale, but I have walked this land. It is beautiful, graced by towering cedar and other trees, green-filtered sunlight, peaceful wetlands, and varied topography that includes a fairly steep ascent up a ridge. It is reminiscent of the Ross Creek Cedars Scenic Area, but it is just a few miles from Sandpoint, not a 1.5-hour drive to Montana.

While in the forest, I saw relatively few marked trees—the ones that would remain after logging. As most trees were not marked, it was clear that, if they are cut, little will remain of the forest. It also seems likely that with the loss of so many trees, erosion of the ridge would be substantial, damaging or ruining it, the wetlands below, and the habitat of many plants and animals.

In the article in The Reader, IDFG’s Panhandle Regional Supervisor Chip Corsi is quoted as saying: “The conservation benefits that IDFG can provide elsewhere outweigh any possible short-term negative impacts of this sale.” It is difficult to believe that the impacts of logging this forest will be anything other than actual, long-term, and worse than merely negative. The benefits have yet to be defined, so it is impossible to evaluate them or whether or not they are worth the sacrifice of the forest’s cedars. Surely there are ways for IDFG to fund regional conservation projects that do not require the logging of an unusual, beneficial natural area that could remain as it is or, in the future, become Sandpoint’s and Bonner County’s own cedar forest park for people to enjoy.

Judy Boucias

While we have you ...

... if you appreciate that access to the news, opinion, humor, entertainment and cultural reporting in the Sandpoint Reader is freely available in our print newspaper as well as here on our website, we have a favor to ask. The Reader is locally owned and free of the large corporate, big-money influence that affects so much of the media today. We're supported entirely by our valued advertisers and readers. We're committed to continued free access to our paper and our website here with NO PAYWALL - period. But of course, it does cost money to produce the Reader. If you're a reader who appreciates the value of an independent, local news source, we hope you'll consider a voluntary contribution. You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.

You can contribute at either Paypal or Patreon.

Contribute at Patreon Contribute at Paypal

You may also like...

Close [x]

Want to support independent local journalism?

The Sandpoint Reader is our town's local, independent weekly newspaper. "Independent" means that the Reader is locally owned, in a partnership between Publisher Ben Olson and Keokee Co. Publishing, the media company owned by Chris Bessler that also publishes Sandpoint Magazine and Sandpoint Online. Sandpoint Reader LLC is a completely independent business unit; no big newspaper group or corporate conglomerate or billionaire owner dictates our editorial policy. And we want the news, opinion and lifestyle stories we report to be freely available to all interested readers - so unlike many other newspapers and media websites, we have NO PAYWALL on our website. The Reader relies wholly on the support of our valued advertisers, as well as readers who voluntarily contribute. Want to ensure that local, independent journalism survives in our town? You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.