By Lyndsie Kiebert
County commissioners will reconsider the wording of the Scotchman Peaks advisory vote — slated for the May 15 primary ballot — at their Tuesday business meeting.
The meeting’s agenda, released Friday, features an item titled: “Discussion/Decision Regarding Proposed Scotchman Peaks Wilderness ‘Advisory’ vote.”
Commissioner Dan McDonald said they are having an open conversation about the vote’s language at the request of Samuels resident Dan Rose.
In the commissioner’s Feb. 20 business meeting, the advisory vote was approved in this form: “Do you favor Senator Jim Rischs’ (sic) proposal for congressional designation of a 13,960-acre Scotchman Peaks area in Bonner County?”
Rose asked commissioners why the words “federal wilderness” were not used in the question, McDonald said. The commissioner said they are revisiting the vote in Tuesday’s meeting simply to “respond to a member of the public.”
“There is a good chance we won’t be changing the language but we will go ahead and have a discussion about it,” he said in an email Friday.
The commissioners will discuss changing the question’s language at 9 a.m. Tuesday, March 6 at the Bonner County Administration Building.
While we have you ...
... if you appreciate that access to the news, opinion, humor, entertainment and cultural reporting in the Sandpoint Reader is freely available in our print newspaper as well as here on our website, we have a favor to ask. The Reader is locally owned and free of the large corporate, big-money influence that affects so much of the media today. We're supported entirely by our valued advertisers and readers. We're committed to continued free access to our paper and our website here with NO PAYWALL - period. But of course, it does cost money to produce the Reader. If you're a reader who appreciates the value of an independent, local news source, we hope you'll consider a voluntary contribution. You can help support the Reader for as little as $1.
You can contribute at either Paypal or Patreon.Contribute at Patreon Contribute at Paypal